Chris
Looks like a good initiative and I was keen to get involved until I realised the prospectus was talking about "Environmental" Sustainability.
We need to be careful here in hwo we define "sustainability".
I have this as a continuing problem in talking about Asset Management Sustainability with executives and Councillors (and in fact all staff not in asset management).
When we look at sustainability in Asset Management we are concerned with Council financial sustainability - can the council(s) continue to deliver the services that the community expects (over the longer term) - and not go broke in the mean time.
Environmental Sustainability is very important, but is not the focus of Asset Management. We do need to be aware of the environment and do whatever we can (in asset managemnt) to consider and keep it in good order (for future generations) but this is a different discipline (and a little more asseteric) than sustainable services to the community.
We need to have clear definitions for asset management, particularly about "sustainability" and what it means in the asset management context.
Let's not get the two areas (environmental and council financial viability) confused, asset management can be confusing enough in its own right!
Regards
-------------------------------------------
Darron Passlow
Asset Management
Pittwater Council
MONA VALE NSW
-------------------------------------------
[CEO Note: Hi Darron, I agree that you can look at 'sustainability' from a number of perspectives. IPWEA is keen to not restrict itself to just looking at sustainability from a financial 'asset management' view but also a wider environmental view also.
Looking at the detail, AGIC's IS sustainability rating tool is not just about the environment. The rating tool considers various sustainability themes and categories. Some of these are environmental focussed, but Management & Governance, People & Place and Innovation are more about the social and economic dimensions of sustainability. (The widely adopted three pillars of sustainability are social , economic & environmental - the 'triple bottom line').
It is true that the IS rating tool presently does not have an economic theme - I understand due to a lack of funds to develop one. But the prospectus states that AGIC intends to add to its rating tool an Economic theme and a Workforce theme.
Asset management can be a very useful tool to take into account the wider risks of climate change, and environment (or social) impacts. We are keen to explore all perspectives to see what we can learn and how we can better manage our community infrastructure from these wider perspectives. I'd encourage people to consider being part of our trial.
Regards,
Chris Champion